Stratégiák

Baromi jó cikk a Seattle Cover 3as védekezéséről:

 www.sbnation.com/nfl/2014/1/29/5355360/super-bowl-xlviii-seahawks-defense-richard-sherman-earl-thomas-covering-peyton-manning

BaltimoreDefense-szel néztük a meccset, Ő is többször bemondta hogy ugyanazt a playt hívjuk 😊

When Chicago Bears defensive coordinator Mel Tucker met with reporters Monday, he noted that the Eagles basically used the same five run plays out of different formations Sunday night to pile up 289 yards on the ground.

If Chip Kelly heard that assessment, it would probably put a big smile on his face – because it’s true.

 www.phillymag.com/birds247/2013/12/24/22-kellys-principles-work/

Ó NFL és a liga übermenschekből álló, szofisztikált védelmei...

nekem chrome-om van es ebben a cikkben csak olyan gifeket latok, amelyek akkor mennek csak, ha az egeret folejuk viszem. amint elmegyek onnet egybol megallnak.

Mizu van a read-optiönnel?
 www.sbnation.com/nfl/2013/11/26/5143258/read-option-plays-scheme-2013-eagles-49ers-seahawks-panthersempty taxi

Min múlik, hogy ez a sok gif ne lassítsa le teljesen a böngészőt és ne kelljen "napokat" várni, hogy rendesen olvasható legyen a cikk: sávszélesség/RAM/bármi más? Esetleg létezik olyan mozilla/chrome kiegésztő, amitől csak akkor indulnak el a gif képek, ha rákattint az ember?

Mizu van a read-optiönnel?
 www.sbnation.com/nfl/2013/11/26/5143258/read-option-plays-scheme-2013-eagles-49ers-seahawks-panthers

Elég érdekesek a stat-ok.
Azért NFL-ben nem ezek a számok lennének, de középiskolában valóban hihető, hogy egy off- és egy onside kick között átlagosan 14 yard a differencia, mivel gondolom sokkal ergyábbak a rúgók.
Bár azért fura, hogy 16-17 éves srácok nem tudnak állítottból nagyobbat rúgni.

ha már sikerült egy olyan topicba belinkelnie, ahova a legkevésbé illik 😊jjncaa

köszi a javítást, erről a topikról megfeledkeztem teljesen.

via

MarioAna

ha már sikerült egy olyan topicba belinkelnie, ahova a legkevésbé illik 😊

Ivy League, 3 QB egyszerre a pályán xD

jjncaa

FCS! FCS! FCS!

Asszem meg van az új kedvenc NCAA csapatom.
És Einstein is itt játszott. 😊

Ivy League, 3 QB egyszerre a pályán xD

 www.sbnation.com/college-football/2013/11/7/5073520/baylor-football-offense-art-briles-2013

Read-Option Progress Report:  www.grantland.com/story/_/id/9911049/bill-barnwell-read-option-scheme

So, where does the read-option stand? Somewhere between where it was and where its detractors think it will end up. It's very obviously not dead. It's also not the mind-blowing force of nature that it was for San Francisco in the playoffs last year, nor could it ever really be that consistently good.

Visszautalva a témában írt legutóbbi bejegyzésre a tavalyi évben az összes támadójáték 1.4 százaléka volt option futójáték. Idén az első nyolc forduló során ez 3.7 százalékra növekedett. Az eredményessége azonban némileg visszaesett:

A tavaly top5 option futó csapat yardátlaga 2012-ben és 2013-ban:



A Bills 15.2 százalékban, az Eagles 31.4 százalékban használja ezeket a futójátékokat idén, 3.9 ill. 5 yardot átlagolva. Egyáltalán nem eget-földet megrengető számok. A legnagyobb előnyük a passzjátékra való hatásuk lehet, amit gondolom nehezebb lenne kigyűjteni, ott mennyit profitálnak ebből.

A cikk részletekbe menően elemzi a védelmek válaszát a read option futásokra és utal az alábbi cikkre is a Smart Footballos Chris Browntól.

😊

Kis no-huddle:  www.sbnation.com/2013/9/13/4722170/no-huddle-hurry-up-offense-nfl-peyton-manning-chip-kelly

jjncaa

Mariota gyorsabb 😊

jjncaa

drop, fumble, baszhatják.

Option, zone-read, pitch játékok az NFL-ben a 2012-es alapszakasz során

Mítoszrombolásra lehet jelentkezni. Csak a Carolina és a Washington használta ezeket a játékokat több mint 10%-ban a támadó playek között. Ill. a 10. játékhét után a Seattle is felugrott közel 12 százalékra (táblázat az espn-es cikken alul). Az idézet a CHFF cikkéből származik:  www.coldhardfootballfacts.com/content/nfl-myth-busting-dont-blame-read-option-for-carolina-panthers-7-9-record/23378/

Based on the hype, you’d think teams like the Seahawks, Redskins, Panthers and 49ers used it as their base offense, yet no one came even close to that. ESPN’s Mike Sando had a very informative article on the topic that showed a total of 457 plays using the zone-read/option/option pitch in 2012. That’s just 1.4 percent of all plays in the NFL. Only 18 teams called it at least once.

It does appear these numbers are only for running plays, as the pass is likely just counted as a play-action pass.

San Francisco and Seattle, two NFC favorites now, only used it 44 and 55 times, respectively. Washington was second in the league with 129 plays (13.0 percent), but even that is a lot less than advertised.

 espn.go.com/blog/nfcwest/post/_/id/95574/run-oriented-qbs-and-nfc-west-mythology

 www.youtube.com/user/FootballAllDay247/videos

Greg Cosell a passzoló-futó irányítókról (read option és pistol formation):

The Pistol was not new in the NFL this past season. In fact, it was utilized extensively in 2008 in Kansas City. (...) Thigpen started 11 games that season, threw 18 touchdown passes and ran for 386 yards. The Chiefs, however, only won one of those 11 games. Thigpen was gone the next season. The main reason: he could not throw the ball well enough to be a consistent NFL starter, no matter what formation or offensive concepts were deployed.

A read optionnel kapcsolatban ugyaníg megemlíti Cam Newtont és részben Tim Tebowt, hogy semmi forradalmi nem történt idén. Ezt már korábban is láthattuk. Az egyetlen különbség, hogy milyen jól, és konzisztensen tudtak passzolni e közben idén a "felfedezett" irányítók.

At the 2006 combine, I had a great conversation with Rick Neuheisel, then the quarterback coach for the Baltimore Ravens. Neuheisel had predominantly been a college coach up to that point, and he felt strongly that the read option (the Pistol features read option concepts) would work in the NFL if coaches would only broaden their thinking. The ability of the quarterback to run on any given play would put such stress on the defense, Neuheisel believed, that extra bodies would be needed to defend that, and coverages would then be simplified and easily defined before the snap of the ball.

Leegyszerűsíti a passzjátékhoz a védelem által használt sémákat a futásveszély miatt, könnyítve az irányító feladatát a passzoknál.

S a végkövetkeztés. Ismét semmi világmegváltó gondolat, de jó néha ennyire földhözragadt cikket is olvasni a témában, ami nem misztifikálja túl a kérdést, valami egyedi csodának beállítva.

While there’s no question more of Saturday’s offensive concepts have, and will continue to spread throughout Sunday’s game, there remains one prevailing difference. In college football, you can be a great quarterback without being a very good passer. In the NFL, that will never be the case.

Az idei draftlisták elején szereplő irányítók közül egyedül EJ Manuelt említi, mint aki köré lehetne ilyen futójátékot építeni ( None of the other top six or seven quarterbacks can do it.). Tehát Geno Smith-t nem sorolja ebbe a kategóriába (nem meglepő módon).

 sports.yahoo.com/blogs/nfl-shutdown-corner/cosell-running-quarterbacks-great-throwing-pocket-still-best-165937022--nfl.html

mi a különbség a pistol, az oregoni spread és a zone read között:

Q: See I read the Times article and assumed as the writer did that the Pistol and Oregon Triple Option were one in the same. Now I am not football illiterate but both scheme seem to mirror each other. They both use the QB to execute an option, both spread the field, and both open alleys for the running game. What am I missing?

A: I actually understand your confusion, given how loosely the terms have been used recently. There are like four of five different concepts/ideas going on, and they all get gunked together by various folks.

At its most basic, and to operate somewhat in chronological order, the idea of using "spread" formations is at least fifty years old, and it involves the idea of spreading your formation using multiple receivers (originally this meant two, but nowadays means more like 3-5) and, at minimum usually means a one-back set.

In more modern times, a "spread offense" is generally a shotgun based offense that uses at least three receivers.

Around the time of the modern spread (arising as a reaction to defenses that increasingly stacked the box), particularly in the late 1990s and early 2000s, the "spread run" game (to use Chip Kelly's term) began springing up which used an updated "option" concept known as a zone read, which combined a basic zone running play with the quarterback reading a backside end. This concept has evolved over the last decade or so to involve other variations, but the combination of shotgun spread formations with the zone read is kind of the foundation of the modern spread-to-run team.

In 2005 Chris Ault wanted to use the shotgun but didn't want to offset the back. Instead he put the runningback directly behind the quarterback. Originally, he didn't even use read plays or other options -- instead he used this "stacked shotgun" alignment but then just ran traditional pro style run plays.

A few years later Chris Ault blended the shotgun spread read plays -- like the zone read -- with his stacked shotgun/pistol formation. His offense exploded, and Nevada led the nation in rushing and also had 3,000+ yards passing. He had a season with 3 different 1,000 yard rushers.

Flash forward to today. Many NFL teams are now using these "shotgun read" plays, but (1) not all of them use "spread formations" to run them and (2) some of them run them from a pistol set while others don't. For example, the Redskins made extensive use of read plays this year, but frequently used regular personnel (two WRs, 1 TE and 1 RB and 1 FB) to run them, all from the pistol alignment. Conversely, the Panthers and Seahawks frequently ran read plays from a regular shotgun set (with the runningback offset to one side) and 3 WRs and 1 TE on the field. This is more of a true spread run game, in the sense Chip uses it -- but as you say it is pretty similar.

The confusion is that NFL types use the term "pistol" to refer to the read game. The most helpful way to think about it is pistol is the formation -- with the RB directly behind the quarterback -- while the read plays are the specific plays. The 49ers are using both; some teams have used the pistol formation but not the read plays, and others have used the read plays and not the pistol formation.

I hope that makes sense. It's difficult to regulate this since most of the verbiage is so inconsistent.

HARBAUGH - DEVELOPING QUARTERBACKS


Jim előadása még a San Diego egyetem edzőjeként, ez önmagában is érdekes, a 27. perc környékén meg izgatottságában szétveri a diavetítőt 😊

 www.grantland.com/story/_/id/8849439/how-terminology-erhardt-perkins-system-helped-maintain-dominance-tom-brady-patriots